Title: Trump’s Attorney Claims Trial Would Amount to Election Interference
Former President Donald Trump’s attorney is arguing that his client’s trial in Georgia would constitute “election interference” if it takes place while he is running for president in the upcoming general election. The trial timing was discussed by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee, who is considering requests from two of Trump’s co-defendants to delay pretrial deadlines.
District Attorney Fani Willis has requested that all defendants, including Trump, be tried together starting on August 5th. However, this would overlap with the final months of the election campaign. Trump’s attorney, Alan Sadow, claims that holding a trial during the election campaign would be the most significant case of election interference in US history.
In response, Prosecutor Nathan Wade rejects the notion that the trial would hinder Trump’s ability to campaign and argues that it does not qualify as election interference. The case against Trump and 18 others stems from accusations of participating in a scheme to illegally try to overturn the results of the 2020 election. While four defendants have already pleaded guilty, the remaining 15, including Trump, have pleaded not guilty.
Despite being the early front-runner for the Republican nominee for president, Trump has three other criminal trials set for next year. Given these circumstances, Trump’s attorney suggests that a trial date should not be scheduled at this time. They argue that it is crucial to allow for other trials to take place and to see how events unfold.
During the court proceedings, the judge raised the question of whether Trump could be tried in 2025 if elected president. Trump’s attorney swiftly argued that the US Constitution’s supremacy clause and his presidential duties would prevent such an eventuality.
Prosecutors have requested a final plea date of June 21. However, the judge suggests that the district attorney could independently set a date after which they would no longer consider plea deals. Defense attorneys have expressed concerns about a potential trial date in 2025 and have advocated for separate trials to be held before August.
In an effort to resolve the issue, the judge proposes splitting the defendants into two groups and allowing prosecutors to determine the order in which the trials will take place. The discussion on trial timing has arisen during arguments over requests by Trump’s former chief of staff and a Justice Department official to delay pretrial motions.
Defense attorneys are also challenging the indictment on various grounds, including arguing that the alleged actions fall under protected political speech. Trump’s attorney plans to file a motion asserting presidential immunity and seeking subpoenas for evidence produced in a separate case against Trump.
As the legal proceedings continue, the question of trial timing remains a contentious issue. With Trump’s potential candidacy for president and multiple criminal trials on the horizon, the court will need to carefully consider the arguments presented by both sides before reaching a verdict on the trial’s scheduling.
“Infuriatingly humble tv expert. Friendly student. Travel fanatic. Bacon fan. Unable to type with boxing gloves on.”